Previous
Previous
R v Antic
Next
Next
Citation: Uber Technologies Inc. v Heller, 2020 SCC 16
A special treat for all you contract law lovers out there! Karly brings you the first part in our three part release of Uber Technologies Inc v David Heller which was recently decided by the Supreme Court of Canada. Before the case, Zach and Karly chat precarious work, unconscionability, ride sharing, and the law of contract generally.
We're back at it with Justice Brown's concurring opinion from Uber v Heller in which he analyzes when a contract should (and should not) consider the element of the public interest. To hear our discussion of the case, head on back to Episode 22.
Welcome to the third installation of our recording of Uber v Heller! We've saved the spiciest for last with Justice Cote's strong dissent which discusses both public interest and unconscionability. To listen to the majority opinion (and for Z + K's take on the case), head back to Episode 22.